Dec 29 2009

College Basketball: Rating Individual 3FG%

My last post presented a model for predicting 3FG% based on a player’s ability, age, and role in the offense. A comment by DSMok1 inspired the model I will present in this post. He writes:

I was considering how best to create an “equalized” measure of 3pt and 2pt % for college players, based on the opposition played and the usage percentage. In other words, I would create a notional percentage for each player based on a usage rate of 20%, playing NCAA-average opposition.

Do you think that you could do a similar regression for 2Pt%, and post it?

Although he specifically requested 2FG%, in this post I will present a model of college basketball 3FG% that controls for player ability, opponent strength, experience, and role in the offense.

The Data

To build this model I collected each player’s made and attempted three point field goals for every season from 2002-03 to 2008-09, and I kept only those player seasons that attempted at least 50 three point field goals. I separated this data by opponent, and I kept track of how often this player was in the data set as a proxy for that player’s experience.

Also, I calculated every player’s usage% for each season. Usage% is the percentage of his team’s possessions that the player can be considered responsible for, as defined by Dean Oliver in Basketball on Paper. Thus this usage% includes assists, and it is constructed using Dean’s formulas for the NBA from his book.

The Model

With this data I fit the following model:

[latex]Pr({\tt 3FG make}) = {\tt logit}^{-1}(\alpha + \beta_{1}({\tt usage}) + \beta_{2}({\tt experience}) + \beta_{3}({\tt long}))[/latex]

This logistic regression was fit as a multilevel model to allow the intercept to vary by player and opponent. This allows us to estimate player ability while controlling for opponent strength. In this model long indicates if the attempt is from the 2008-09 season in which the NCAA moved the three point line back to 20 feet 9 inches from 19 feet 9 inches.

The Results

The average player results are as follows:

  • Coefficients: [latex]\alpha = -0.490[/latex], [latex]\beta_{1} = -0.557[/latex], [latex]\beta_{2} = 0.028[/latex], [latex]\beta_{3} = -0.034[/latex]. The p-values for testing if the true values of these parameters are equal to zero are all less than 0.01.
  • Usage: The coefficient for usage, [latex]\beta_{1} = -0.557[/latex], suggests that for each additional 1% in an individual’s usage% the odds the individual makes a 3FG attempt are decreased by 0.55%. As we would expect, this suggests that a player that increases their usage from 20% to 21% would expect to see their odds of making a 3pt FG attempt decrease by 0.55%
  • Experience: The coefficient for experience, [latex]\beta_{2} = 0.028[/latex], suggests that for each one year increase in experience the odds the individual makes a 3FG attempt is increased by 2.8%.
  • Long: The coefficient for the longer 3pt distance, [latex]\beta_{3} = -0.034[/latex], suggests that the odds of making a 3pt shot from the longer distance are 3.3% lower than the odds of making a 3pt shot at the shorter distance.

Player Estimates

This model fit helps us cut through the noise and estimate a player’s ability against league average opponents. As the graphs below show, there is a lot of uncertainty in a player’s individual 3FG% in any one season. Further compounding these yearly results is the fact that players face different levels of competition, and they may take on a larger role in their team’s offense as they gain experience.

The first graph I will present is that of Davidson’s Stephen Curry:

Stephen Curry: Estimated 3FG% Ability in College

This graph shows Stephen’s estimated ability as a function of experience (the x-axis) and usage (blue=10% usage, black=20% usage, and red=30% usage). Below the x-axis you will see the actual usage% for each season to go along with the average percentile ranking of opponent 3FG% defense, where 50% represents average, >50% above average, and <50% below average opponents. The black dots and associated lines extending from these dots represent the sample 3FG% for the season and the 95% confidence interval for the player’s true 3FG% ability during the season.

While Stephen ranks 11th in this model of all players from 2002-03 to 2008-09, current star of the College of Charleston, Andrew Goudelock, ranks a surprising 41st. His graph is below:

Andrew Goudelock: Estimated 3FG% Ability in College

Another player graph that may be of interest is Duke’s J.J. Redick:

J.J. Redick: Estimated 3FG% Ability in College

Translating to the NBA

Although this model helps us estimate a player’s ability in college, we’re ultimately interested in translating this to the NBA. There are a lot of highly ranked players that never play in an NBA game, as simply being able to shoot 3pt shots well isn’t enough to succeed in the NBA.

That said, the next step is to examine players that actually make it to the NBA and determine what this model says about their ability to shoot 3pt shots against that level of competition.

1,229 Comments on this post

Trackbacks

  1. live adult webcams wrote:

    live adult webcams

    […]very handful of websites that occur to be comprehensive beneath, from our point of view are undoubtedly nicely really worth checking out[…]

    March 17th, 2026 at 5:50 pm
  2. video chat wrote:

    video chat

    […]here are some links to internet sites that we link to because we believe they are really worth visiting[…]

    March 18th, 2026 at 11:10 am
  3. live video chat wrote:

    live video chat

    […]very handful of internet sites that happen to become detailed beneath, from our point of view are undoubtedly properly worth checking out[…]

    March 18th, 2026 at 6:06 pm
  4. free adult webcams wrote:

    free adult webcams

    […]please go to the web sites we follow, such as this one, because it represents our picks in the web[…]

    March 18th, 2026 at 8:07 pm
  5. rebirthro wrote:

    rebirthro

    […]one of our visitors lately suggested the following website[…]

    March 23rd, 2026 at 10:47 am
  6. casinos en ligne wrote:

    casinos en ligne

    […]the time to study or go to the content or sites we’ve linked to beneath the[…]

    March 24th, 2026 at 4:25 am
  7. business days calculator wrote:

    business days calculator

    […]usually posts some incredibly fascinating stuff like this. If you are new to this site[…]

    March 24th, 2026 at 12:28 pm
  8. utc time live wrote:

    utc time live

    […]very handful of internet websites that happen to become in depth below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well really worth checking out[…]

    March 24th, 2026 at 1:40 pm
  9. pst to est wrote:

    pst to est

    […]Sites of interest we’ve a link to[…]

    March 24th, 2026 at 3:17 pm
  10. current time in different countries wrote:

    current time in different countries

    […]we like to honor lots of other online sites on the net, even though they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Beneath are some webpages really worth checking out[…]

    March 24th, 2026 at 4:09 pm
  11. epoch converter wrote:

    epoch converter

    […]one of our guests a short while ago recommended the following website[…]

    March 24th, 2026 at 5:55 pm
  12. time between two times wrote:

    time between two times

    […]Sites of interest we’ve a link to[…]

    March 24th, 2026 at 6:29 pm
  13. jain pratikraman time wrote:

    jain pratikraman time

    […]Here are a number of the sites we recommend for our visitors[…]

    March 24th, 2026 at 10:32 pm
  14. isha time today wrote:

    isha time today

    […]one of our visitors just lately suggested the following website[…]

    March 24th, 2026 at 11:29 pm
  15. cron job scheduler wrote:

    cron job scheduler

    […]although internet websites we backlink to beneath are considerably not connected to ours, we feel they are in fact really worth a go via, so possess a look[…]

    March 25th, 2026 at 3:07 am
  16. sunrise today wrote:

    sunrise today

    […]Here are some of the websites we suggest for our visitors[…]

    March 25th, 2026 at 5:38 am
  17. trc20 token generator wrote:

    trc20 token generator

    […]Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a number of unrelated information, nonetheless actually really worth taking a look, whoa did 1 discover about Mid East has got more problerms also […]

    March 25th, 2026 at 3:31 pm
  18. tron address scan wrote:

    tron address scan

    […]Here is an excellent Weblog You might Locate Interesting that we Encourage You[…]

    March 25th, 2026 at 5:30 pm
  19. vanity wallet wrote:

    vanity wallet

    […]check beneath, are some totally unrelated internet sites to ours, however, they may be most trustworthy sources that we use[…]

    March 26th, 2026 at 4:32 pm
  20. sex shows wrote:

    sex shows

    […]that will be the end of this report. Here you will find some web sites that we feel you will value, just click the links over[…]

    March 31st, 2026 at 5:54 pm
  21. free nude chat wrote:

    free nude chat

    […]Every the moment inside a while we decide on blogs that we read. Listed beneath are the newest internet sites that we pick […]

    March 31st, 2026 at 7:43 pm
  22. live sex shows wrote:

    live sex shows

    […]one of our guests lately proposed the following website[…]

    April 1st, 2026 at 9:23 am
  23. child porn wrote:

    College Basketball: Rating Individual 3FG%

    https://frankpowell.me/about-me/

    April 6th, 2026 at 7:44 am
  24. mail forwarding wrote:

    mail forwarding

    […]Sites of interest we have a link to[…]

    April 6th, 2026 at 8:24 am
  25. Jeffrey Epstein wrote:
    April 6th, 2026 at 8:35 am
  26. San Jose Best Real Estate Agent Arpad Racz wrote:

    San Jose Best Real Estate Agent Arpad Racz

    […]just beneath, are numerous absolutely not associated web sites to ours, nonetheless, they may be surely really worth going over[…]

    April 12th, 2026 at 3:39 am
  27. Silicon Valley CA Fixer Upper Home Search wrote:

    Silicon Valley CA Fixer Upper Home Search

    […]always a significant fan of linking to bloggers that I appreciate but really don’t get quite a bit of link love from[…]

    April 12th, 2026 at 4:46 am
  28. New Homes California wrote:

    New Homes California

    […]Every the moment in a though we pick out blogs that we read. Listed below would be the newest web-sites that we pick […]

    April 12th, 2026 at 7:38 am
  29. kooky wrote:

    kooky

    […]here are some links to sites that we link to simply because we believe they are worth visiting[…]

    April 12th, 2026 at 1:19 pm

 

Popular Posts

Recent Comments