Dec 5 2009

Estimating Individual Impact on Defensive Efficiency

Earlier this week in @johnschuhmann‘s excellent column The Numbers Game, John looks at how Andre Miller impacts defensive efficiency. This, along with @kpelton‘s note that “the Blazers have been more effective defensively when Joel Przybilla is playing than when Greg Oden is playing” (from Blazersedge) has helped motivate me to look at what estimates we can draw about the impact these players have on defensive efficiency. The goal of this study is to do two things: 1) estimate the impact these players have on defensive efficiency, and 2) quantify the uncertainty we have about these estimates.

Constructing the Model

I have been doing some research to figure out how to best model the number of points teams score and allow on an individual possession, so I will be using that type of model for creating these estimates of an individual’s impact on defensive efficiency. The biggest difference between what I’m doing and adjusted plus/minus is that I consider what happens on each possession rather than what happens over a span of possessions for each combination of players. This means that I can better estimate the individual impact on allowing points to be scored on an individual possession rather than simply estimating the individual impact on the mean number of points allowed per hundred possessions.

There are many different ways to construct this model for estimating individual player impact on defensive efficiency, but I’ve chosen the modeling option I feel most comfortable with:

  • Fitting the model using all NBA possessions, where individual teams, Blazers’ players, home court advantage, number of offensive reserves, and being in the penalty are considered as predictors.

This modeling option controls for things we know to be important like opposing team strength, home court advantage, number of offensive reserves, and being in the penalty. The number of offensive reserves is intended to be a proxy for individual opponent strength. Although that was the intention, it is also true that the number of offensive reserves is correlated with game situation, like blowouts. Thus this is certainly one area of the model that can be improved on in the future.

Examining Andre Miller’s Defense

In The Numbers Game, John first writes about what Andre did with Philadelphia last year, so I’ll start there: what was Andre’s impact on Philadelphia’s defense? To measure this, we need a player to compare him against. Like John, I will compare Andre to Lou Williams.

To do a comparison in terms of efficiency, I must select teammates for these players. In this case, I have chosen the players from Philadelphia’s most used lineup last year: Andre Iguodala, Samuel Dalembert, Thaddeus Young, and Willie Green. Also, these estimates of defensive efficiency come from assuming there are zero opponent reserve players and that the lineup is not in the penalty.

Under these assumptions, the model estimates that this lineup with Andre performs at 0.18 points per hundred possessions worse than with Lou. A 95% confidence interval for this estimate is (-9.4, 9.2). This estimated difference is small, and there is a lot of uncertainty around this estimate. Even after a full season we do not have much confidence in saying either player has a better impact on defensive efficiency in the context of this lineup. Strictly in terms of defensive efficiency, this model suggests we could plausibly get by with either player. Defense is only half of the game, but for our purposes of evaluating defense we wouldn’t prefer one player over the other.

Thus this analysis doesn’t agree with John’s conclusion that “… Miller’s -3.2 differential was aided by the amount of time he spent on the floor next to Iguodala and Thaddeus Young, but Lou Williams’ +5.9 differential last season makes it pretty clear that he’s not the defender that Miller is.” This model suggests that Andre Iguodala and Thaddeus Young were Philadelphia’s best defenders last year, so perhaps this means that John isn’t giving them enough credit for what they’re doing on defense.

Andre Miller versus Steve Blake

Looking at last year is fun, but what we’re most interested in right now is comparing Andre’s defensive impact to the defensive impact of one of his current teammates, Steve Blake. To estimate the difference between Andre’s and Steve’s impact on defensive efficiency, I’ve selected Brandon Roy, Greg Oden, LaMarcus Aldridge, and Martell Webster to be their teammates.

Under these conditions, the model estimates that the lineup with Andre performs 0.05 points per hundred possessions worse than the lineup with Steve Blake. A 95% confidence interval for this difference is (-15.3, 13.8), and this means that similar to Andre versus Lou, the model suggests that we shouldn’t prefer either player in terms of their defensive impact.

Greg Oden versus Joel Przybilla

Although Kevin Pelton pointed out the difference between Greg’s and Joel’s defensive play this year, I want to first look at what conclusion we’d draw about the defensive play of these players at the end of last year. To do this, I’ve selected Brandon Roy, LaMarcus Aldridge, Nicolas Batum, and Steve Blake to be their teammates.

Under these conditions, the model estimates that the lineup with Greg performs 6.6 points per hundred possessions worse than the lineup with Joel. A 95% confidence interval for this difference is (0.65, 13.1), suggesting that we can be confident that in 2008-09 Joel’s defensive impact with this lineup was better than Greg’s defensive impact with this lineup.

For this season’s estimate I have selected Andre Miller, Bradon Roy, LaMarcus Aldridge, and Steve Blake to be their teammates. Under these conditions, the model estimates that the lineup with Greg Oden performs 5.9 points per hundred possessions worse than the lineup with Joel Przybilla.

A 95% confidence interval for this difference is (-7.0, 17.1), and this means that even though we estimate Joel’s defensive impact with this lineup to better than Greg’s impact with this lineup, we need more data before we can confidently make this statement like we could in 2008-09. Because the estimate is practically significant, I’d still prefer Joel over Greg if forced to make a choice strictly in terms of defensive impact.

But…

This model isn’t perfect. The way I control for individual opponent strength could be improved. And even though this type of model has the best of intentions, it will not tell us why players are having the impacts we estimate. It gives us more information than adjusted +/-, such as the impact an individual has on the specific number of points given up on defense, but we can still make use of other statistics for trying to dig into the why. Even these other statistics don’t tell us everything, so it is not surprising to me that coaches prefer video to statistics.

Lastly, this analysis doesn’t exactly clear up any debates Blazers’ fans may be having, like should Andre or Steve be starting, or should Greg or Joel get more playing time? This model is just one way of looking at the data, and defense counts for just half of what teams do to win games. Thus I’ll leave it up to rabid Blazers’ fans to weigh the deficiencies of this model and to figure out which players are better on offense. 🙂

334 Comments on this post

Trackbacks

  1. bitcoinblack.netcommunitycanadianpharmacyonlineviagrainfo wrote:

    Generic for viagra https://bitcoinblack.net/community/canadianpharmacyonlineviagra/info/

    With thanks, Plenty of info!

    December 20th, 2022 at 12:26 pm
  2. canadian pharmacy king wrote:

    canada pharmacies https://forum.melanoma.org/user/canadadrugsonline/profile/

    Wow a lot of very good info.

    December 20th, 2022 at 5:01 pm
  3. wakelet.com@OnlinepharmacyCanadausa wrote:

    5 mg viagra coupon printable https://wakelet.com/@OnlinepharmacyCanadausa

    Whoa all kinds of useful information.

    December 21st, 2022 at 12:09 pm
  4. https://www.divephotoguide.com/user/canadadrugspharmacyonline wrote:

    Viagra canada https://www.divephotoguide.com/user/canadadrugspharmacyonline

    Thanks! Great information.

    December 22nd, 2022 at 2:51 pm
  5. madridbet wrote:

    Estimating Individual Impact on Defensive Efficiency

    https://www.saintjoseph-aix.fr/2016/09/18/les-ateliers-sciences-en-cm1/

    December 22nd, 2022 at 5:48 pm
  6. canadian pharmacies wrote:

    best canadian pharmacy https://my.desktopnexus.com/Canadianpharmacygeneric/journal/

    You made your point.

    December 22nd, 2022 at 7:29 pm
  7. Meritking wrote:
    December 24th, 2022 at 9:40 am
  8. canadianpharmaceuticalsonlinee.iwopop.com wrote:

    Viagra levitra http://canadianpharmaceuticalsonlinee.iwopop.com/

    Effectively expressed certainly. .

    December 25th, 2022 at 12:12 pm
  9. kahve oyun wrote:

    Estimating Individual Impact on Defensive Efficiency

    http://miwmeste.ru/forum/read/id-4482/start–20

    December 25th, 2022 at 1:03 pm
  10. datastudio.google.comreporting1e2ea892-3f18-4459-932e-6fcd458f5505pageMCR7C wrote:

    Viagra 20 mg best price https://datastudio.google.com/reporting/1e2ea892-3f18-4459-932e-6fcd458f5505/page/MCR7C

    You actually expressed this terrifically!

    December 25th, 2022 at 4:43 pm
  11. https://pharmacycheapnoprescription.nethouse.ru/ wrote:

    Low cost viagra 20mg https://pharmacycheapnoprescription.nethouse.ru/

    Very good stuff. Thank you!

    December 26th, 2022 at 7:57 am
  12. canada pharmacy wrote:

    list of reputable canadian pharmacies https://www.midi.org/forum/profile/96944-pharmacyonlinecheap

    Terrific data. Thank you.

    December 26th, 2022 at 12:55 pm
  13. canadian pharmacy viagra brand wrote:

    Canadian Pharmacy USA https://www.provenexpert.com/canadian-pharmacy-viagra-generic2/

    Thanks a lot! Fantastic information!

    December 26th, 2022 at 6:11 pm
  14. okey oyna wrote:

    Estimating Individual Impact on Defensive Efficiency

    https://hioki.asia/may-kiem-tra-day-cap-tenmars-tm-904/

    December 27th, 2022 at 8:16 am
  15. dailygram.comblog1183360canada-online-pharmacies wrote:

    Viagra cost https://dailygram.com/blog/1183360/canada-online-pharmacies/

    You definitely made your point.

    December 27th, 2022 at 5:58 pm
  16. bitbucket.orgcanadianpharmaceuticalsonlineworkspacesnippetsk7KRy4 wrote:
    January 5th, 2023 at 3:21 pm
  17. rabbitroom.commembersonlinepharmacydrugstoreprofile wrote:

    Viagra sans ordonnance https://rabbitroom.com/members/onlinepharmacydrugstore/profile/

    Regards. Numerous info.

    January 5th, 2023 at 8:49 pm
  18. www.mixcloud.comcanadianpharmaceuticalsonline wrote:

    Viagra canada https://www.mixcloud.com/canadianpharmaceuticalsonline/

    Regards. Valuable information.

    January 6th, 2023 at 12:24 pm
  19. https://sketchfab.com/canadianpharmaceuticalsonline wrote:

    Viagra coupon https://sketchfab.com/canadianpharmaceuticalsonline

    Awesome stuff. Regards.

    January 9th, 2023 at 7:50 am
  20. Canadian Pharmacy USA wrote:

    canada pharmacies https://fliphtml5.com/homepage/fhrha

    Cheers, A lot of content.

    January 9th, 2023 at 2:35 pm
  21. www.goodreads.comusershow161146330-canadianpharmaceuticalsonline wrote:
    January 9th, 2023 at 7:29 pm
  22. myanimelist.netprofilecanadapharmacies wrote:

    Viagra great britain https://myanimelist.net/profile/canadapharmacies

    Excellent information. Thanks a lot!

    January 10th, 2023 at 10:48 am
  23. https://pharmacyonlineprescription.webflow.io/ wrote:

    Tadalafil tablets https://pharmacyonlineprescription.webflow.io/

    Wow a good deal of helpful advice!

    January 11th, 2023 at 3:06 pm
  24. northwest pharmacy canada wrote:

    canadian pharmacy cialis https://slides.com/bestcanadianonlinepharmacies

    Nicely put, Thank you!

    January 20th, 2023 at 1:07 pm
  25. https://www.mojomarketplace.com/user/discountcanadiandrugs-f0IpYCKav8 wrote:

    Viagra or viagra https://www.mojomarketplace.com/user/discountcanadiandrugs-f0IpYCKav8

    Good material, Many thanks!

    January 21st, 2023 at 8:30 am
  26. canadianpharmaceuticalsonlinee.bandcamp.comtrackcanadian-pharmaceuticals-usa wrote:
    January 23rd, 2023 at 12:42 pm
  27. https://www.askclassifieds.com/listing/aarp-recommended-canadian-pharmacies/ wrote:
    January 23rd, 2023 at 8:21 pm
  28. https://www.gamespace.com/members/canadianprescriptionsonline/ wrote:

    Viagra 20 mg https://www.gamespace.com/members/canadianprescriptionsonline/

    Thanks a lot. A lot of forum posts.

    January 26th, 2023 at 12:35 pm
  29. haikudeck.compresentationscanadianpharmacies wrote:

    Discount viagra https://haikudeck.com/presentations/canadianpharmacies

    Awesome write ups. Cheers!

    January 27th, 2023 at 1:21 pm
  30. www.bakespace.commembersprofileViagra generic online Pharmacy1562809 wrote:

    How does viagra work https://www.bakespace.com/members/profile/Viagra generic online Pharmacy/1562809/

    Thanks, An abundance of advice!

    January 28th, 2023 at 9:03 am
  31. conifer.rhizome.orgDiscountpharmacy wrote:

    How does viagra work https://conifer.rhizome.org/Discountpharmacy

    Truly lots of valuable info!

    January 28th, 2023 at 2:14 pm
  32. https://haikudeck.com/presentations/cheapprescriptiondrugs wrote:

    Viagra vs viagra https://haikudeck.com/presentations/cheapprescriptiondrugs

    Thank you, I like it.

    January 29th, 2023 at 10:56 am
  33. online pharmacy wrote:

    canadian pharmacies that ship to us https://experiment.com/users/pviagrapharmacy100mg

    Cheers, An abundance of postings.

    January 29th, 2023 at 9:13 pm
  34. https://slides.com/canadianpharmacycialis20mg wrote:

    Buy viagra online https://slides.com/canadianpharmacycialis20mg

    Thank you, A good amount of stuff.

    January 30th, 2023 at 12:36 pm

 

Popular Posts

Recent Comments