Dec 5 2009

Estimating Individual Impact on Defensive Efficiency

Earlier this week in @johnschuhmann‘s excellent column The Numbers Game, John looks at how Andre Miller impacts defensive efficiency. This, along with @kpelton‘s note that “the Blazers have been more effective defensively when Joel Przybilla is playing than when Greg Oden is playing” (from Blazersedge) has helped motivate me to look at what estimates we can draw about the impact these players have on defensive efficiency. The goal of this study is to do two things: 1) estimate the impact these players have on defensive efficiency, and 2) quantify the uncertainty we have about these estimates.

Constructing the Model

I have been doing some research to figure out how to best model the number of points teams score and allow on an individual possession, so I will be using that type of model for creating these estimates of an individual’s impact on defensive efficiency. The biggest difference between what I’m doing and adjusted plus/minus is that I consider what happens on each possession rather than what happens over a span of possessions for each combination of players. This means that I can better estimate the individual impact on allowing points to be scored on an individual possession rather than simply estimating the individual impact on the mean number of points allowed per hundred possessions.

There are many different ways to construct this model for estimating individual player impact on defensive efficiency, but I’ve chosen the modeling option I feel most comfortable with:

  • Fitting the model using all NBA possessions, where individual teams, Blazers’ players, home court advantage, number of offensive reserves, and being in the penalty are considered as predictors.

This modeling option controls for things we know to be important like opposing team strength, home court advantage, number of offensive reserves, and being in the penalty. The number of offensive reserves is intended to be a proxy for individual opponent strength. Although that was the intention, it is also true that the number of offensive reserves is correlated with game situation, like blowouts. Thus this is certainly one area of the model that can be improved on in the future.

Examining Andre Miller’s Defense

In The Numbers Game, John first writes about what Andre did with Philadelphia last year, so I’ll start there: what was Andre’s impact on Philadelphia’s defense? To measure this, we need a player to compare him against. Like John, I will compare Andre to Lou Williams.

To do a comparison in terms of efficiency, I must select teammates for these players. In this case, I have chosen the players from Philadelphia’s most used lineup last year: Andre Iguodala, Samuel Dalembert, Thaddeus Young, and Willie Green. Also, these estimates of defensive efficiency come from assuming there are zero opponent reserve players and that the lineup is not in the penalty.

Under these assumptions, the model estimates that this lineup with Andre performs at 0.18 points per hundred possessions worse than with Lou. A 95% confidence interval for this estimate is (-9.4, 9.2). This estimated difference is small, and there is a lot of uncertainty around this estimate. Even after a full season we do not have much confidence in saying either player has a better impact on defensive efficiency in the context of this lineup. Strictly in terms of defensive efficiency, this model suggests we could plausibly get by with either player. Defense is only half of the game, but for our purposes of evaluating defense we wouldn’t prefer one player over the other.

Thus this analysis doesn’t agree with John’s conclusion that “… Miller’s -3.2 differential was aided by the amount of time he spent on the floor next to Iguodala and Thaddeus Young, but Lou Williams’ +5.9 differential last season makes it pretty clear that he’s not the defender that Miller is.” This model suggests that Andre Iguodala and Thaddeus Young were Philadelphia’s best defenders last year, so perhaps this means that John isn’t giving them enough credit for what they’re doing on defense.

Andre Miller versus Steve Blake

Looking at last year is fun, but what we’re most interested in right now is comparing Andre’s defensive impact to the defensive impact of one of his current teammates, Steve Blake. To estimate the difference between Andre’s and Steve’s impact on defensive efficiency, I’ve selected Brandon Roy, Greg Oden, LaMarcus Aldridge, and Martell Webster to be their teammates.

Under these conditions, the model estimates that the lineup with Andre performs 0.05 points per hundred possessions worse than the lineup with Steve Blake. A 95% confidence interval for this difference is (-15.3, 13.8), and this means that similar to Andre versus Lou, the model suggests that we shouldn’t prefer either player in terms of their defensive impact.

Greg Oden versus Joel Przybilla

Although Kevin Pelton pointed out the difference between Greg’s and Joel’s defensive play this year, I want to first look at what conclusion we’d draw about the defensive play of these players at the end of last year. To do this, I’ve selected Brandon Roy, LaMarcus Aldridge, Nicolas Batum, and Steve Blake to be their teammates.

Under these conditions, the model estimates that the lineup with Greg performs 6.6 points per hundred possessions worse than the lineup with Joel. A 95% confidence interval for this difference is (0.65, 13.1), suggesting that we can be confident that in 2008-09 Joel’s defensive impact with this lineup was better than Greg’s defensive impact with this lineup.

For this season’s estimate I have selected Andre Miller, Bradon Roy, LaMarcus Aldridge, and Steve Blake to be their teammates. Under these conditions, the model estimates that the lineup with Greg Oden performs 5.9 points per hundred possessions worse than the lineup with Joel Przybilla.

A 95% confidence interval for this difference is (-7.0, 17.1), and this means that even though we estimate Joel’s defensive impact with this lineup to better than Greg’s impact with this lineup, we need more data before we can confidently make this statement like we could in 2008-09. Because the estimate is practically significant, I’d still prefer Joel over Greg if forced to make a choice strictly in terms of defensive impact.

But…

This model isn’t perfect. The way I control for individual opponent strength could be improved. And even though this type of model has the best of intentions, it will not tell us why players are having the impacts we estimate. It gives us more information than adjusted +/-, such as the impact an individual has on the specific number of points given up on defense, but we can still make use of other statistics for trying to dig into the why. Even these other statistics don’t tell us everything, so it is not surprising to me that coaches prefer video to statistics.

Lastly, this analysis doesn’t exactly clear up any debates Blazers’ fans may be having, like should Andre or Steve be starting, or should Greg or Joel get more playing time? This model is just one way of looking at the data, and defense counts for just half of what teams do to win games. Thus I’ll leave it up to rabid Blazers’ fans to weigh the deficiencies of this model and to figure out which players are better on offense. 🙂

139 Comments on this post

Trackbacks

  1. Canadian Pharmacy USA wrote:

    canadian pharmacy online 24 https://pinshape.com/users/2441621-canadian-pharmaceutical-companies

    You actually revealed that well.

    September 7th, 2022 at 10:30 am
  2. https://reallygoodemails.com/canadianpharmaceuticalcompanies wrote:
    September 7th, 2022 at 2:34 pm
  3. buy stromectol uk wrote:

    order stromectol online https://pinshape.com/users/2445987-order-stromectol-over-the-counter

    Truly quite a lot of awesome material!

    September 9th, 2022 at 8:47 am
  4. order stromectol no prescription wrote:

    is stromectol safe https://reallygoodemails.com/orderstromectoloverthecounter

    You definitely made your point!

    September 9th, 2022 at 1:28 pm
  5. challonge.comenorderstromectoloverthecounter wrote:

    Viagra pills https://challonge.com/en/orderstromectoloverthecounter

    With thanks, Quite a lot of material.

    September 10th, 2022 at 7:23 am
  6. https://500px.com/p/orderstromectoloverthecounter wrote:

    Viagra daily https://500px.com/p/orderstromectoloverthecounter

    Awesome content. Thanks!

    September 10th, 2022 at 11:10 am
  7. stromectol rosacea wrote:

    stromectol cvs https://www.seje.gov.mz/question/order-stromectol-over-the-counter-6/

    Cheers, Awesome information.

    September 10th, 2022 at 7:01 pm
  8. canadajobscenter.comauthorbuystromectol wrote:

    Tadalafil tablets https://canadajobscenter.com/author/buystromectol/

    Thank you! I like this.

    September 11th, 2022 at 5:36 am
  9. canadajobscenter.comauthorcanadianpharmaceuticalsonline wrote:

    Viagra vs viagra vs levitra https://canadajobscenter.com/author/canadianpharmaceuticalsonline/

    Terrific tips. Thanks a lot.

    September 11th, 2022 at 9:13 am
  10. canadianpharmacy wrote:

    canadian viagra https://aoc.stamford.edu/profile/canadianpharmaceuticalsonline/

    Many thanks, Numerous forum posts.

    September 11th, 2022 at 12:59 pm
  11. canadianpharmaceuticalsonline.bandcamp.comreleases wrote:

    Viagra or viagra https://canadianpharmaceuticalsonline.bandcamp.com/releases

    Amazing quite a lot of beneficial tips.

    September 12th, 2022 at 5:59 am
  12. northwest pharmacies wrote:

    canadian pharmacy meds https://ktqt.ftu.edu.vn/en/question list/canadian-pharmaceuticals-for-usa-sales/

    Incredible quite a lot of valuable advice!

    September 13th, 2022 at 2:21 am
  13. canadian pharmacies mail order wrote:

    prescription drugs without prior prescription https://www.provenexpert.com/canadian-pharmaceuticals-online/

    Whoa plenty of superb facts!

    September 13th, 2022 at 7:25 am
  14. stromectol sale wrote:

    ivermectina https://aoc.stamford.edu/profile/Stromectol/

    Appreciate it, Numerous data.

    September 13th, 2022 at 1:26 pm
  15. ktqt.ftu.edu.vnenquestion listorder-stromectol-over-the-counter-10 wrote:

    Viagra dosage https://ktqt.ftu.edu.vn/en/question list/order-stromectol-over-the-counter-10/

    You actually revealed this really well.

    September 13th, 2022 at 5:18 pm
  16. stromectol cream wrote:
    September 14th, 2022 at 4:53 am
  17. www.provenexpert.comorder-stromectol-over-the-counter12 wrote:

    Viagra alternative https://www.provenexpert.com/order-stromectol-over-the-counter12/

    Great content. With thanks.

    September 14th, 2022 at 8:25 am
  18. https://www.repairanswers.net/question/order-stromectol-over-the-counter-2/ wrote:
    September 14th, 2022 at 1:25 pm
  19. buy ivermectin online fitndance wrote:

    stromectol posologie https://www.repairanswers.net/question/stromectol-order-online/

    Terrific stuff. Thank you.

    September 16th, 2022 at 6:36 am
  20. https://canadajobscenter.com/author/arpreparof1989/ wrote:

    Viagra vs viagra https://canadajobscenter.com/author/arpreparof1989/

    You’ve made the point.

    September 16th, 2022 at 10:27 am
  21. https://aoc.stamford.edu/profile/goatunmantmen/ wrote:

    Viagra vs viagra vs levitra https://aoc.stamford.edu/profile/goatunmantmen/

    Very well voiced certainly! .

    September 17th, 2022 at 9:48 am
  22. stromectol pills wrote:

    stromectol reviews https://web904.com/stromectol-buy/

    Many thanks, Plenty of data!

    September 17th, 2022 at 3:45 pm
  23. https://web904.com/buy-ivermectin-online-fitndance/ wrote:

    Viagra or viagra https://web904.com/buy-ivermectin-online-fitndance/

    Many thanks. I like this!

    September 18th, 2022 at 8:55 am
  24. https://glycvimepedd.bandcamp.com/releases wrote:

    Viagra manufacturer coupon https://glycvimepedd.bandcamp.com/releases

    Truly lots of helpful information.

    September 18th, 2022 at 12:25 pm
  25. canadian pharmacy world wrote:

    best canadian mail order pharmacies https://canadajobscenter.com/author/ereswasint/

    You expressed it wonderfully!

    September 19th, 2022 at 9:51 am
  26. https://aoc.stamford.edu/profile/hispennbackwin/ wrote:

    Viagra great britain https://aoc.stamford.edu/profile/hispennbackwin/

    Amazing loads of great advice.

    September 19th, 2022 at 2:24 pm
  27. bursuppsligme.bandcamp.comreleases wrote:

    Viagra uk https://bursuppsligme.bandcamp.com/releases

    Many thanks! Plenty of information.

    September 19th, 2022 at 6:08 pm
  28. https://pinshape.com/users/2461310-canadian-pharmacies-shipping-to-usa wrote:

    Viagra rezeptfrei https://pinshape.com/users/2461310-canadian-pharmacies-shipping-to-usa

    Useful data. Appreciate it!

    September 20th, 2022 at 7:02 am
  29. https://pinshape.com/users/2462760-order-stromectol-over-the-counter wrote:

    Tadalafil https://pinshape.com/users/2462760-order-stromectol-over-the-counter

    Amazing forum posts. Appreciate it.

    September 20th, 2022 at 10:46 am
  30. pinshape.comusers2462910-order-stromectol-online wrote:

    Viagra 5 mg funziona https://pinshape.com/users/2462910-order-stromectol-online

    You actually suggested this well!

    September 20th, 2022 at 3:05 pm
  31. 500px.com/p/phraspilliti wrote:

    Viagra 20 mg best price 500px.com/p/phraspilliti

    Very good postings. Thanks!

    September 21st, 2022 at 11:41 am
  32. no 1 canadian pharcharmy online wrote:

    discount canadian pharmacies https://web904.com/canadian-pharmaceuticals-for-usa-sales/

    Amazing postings. Thanks!

    September 22nd, 2022 at 5:31 am
  33. 500px.compskulogovid?view=groups wrote:

    Buy viagra online https://500px.com/p/skulogovid/?view=groups

    Whoa many of superb facts.

    September 23rd, 2022 at 7:10 am
  34. https://500px.com/p/bersavahi/?view=groups wrote:

    Viagra levitra https://500px.com/p/bersavahi/?view=groups

    Seriously all kinds of very good tips!

    September 23rd, 2022 at 11:09 am
  35. reallygoodemails.comcanadianpharmaceuticalsonlineusa wrote:

    Viagra reviews https://reallygoodemails.com/canadianpharmaceuticalsonlineusa

    You actually stated this really well.

    September 24th, 2022 at 4:19 am
  36. https://www.provenexpert.com/canadian-pharmaceuticals-online-usa/ wrote:

    Viagra uk https://www.provenexpert.com/canadian-pharmaceuticals-online-usa/

    Terrific forum posts. Many thanks.

    September 24th, 2022 at 7:51 am
  37. sanangelolive.commemberspharmaceuticals wrote:

    Viagra generico online https://sanangelolive.com/members/pharmaceuticals

    Valuable stuff. Kudos.

    September 24th, 2022 at 12:56 pm
  38. https://melaninterest.com/user/canadian-pharmaceuticals-online/?view=likes wrote:
    September 26th, 2022 at 12:00 pm
  39. https://haikudeck.com/canadian-pharmaceuticals-online-personal-presentation-827506e003 wrote:
    September 26th, 2022 at 3:59 pm

 

Popular Posts

Recent Comments